SiliconBeat has the scoop on the new Friendster classifieds community for the Phillipines, Pusit. Is it just me or does that page resemble a get-rich-quick parked domain, right down to the font? When I first arrived, I assumed SiliconBeat had gotten the link wrong.
cheap adipex online adipex between difference phentermine adipex testimonials adipex retard cheapest adipex diet pill canadian pharmacies selling adipex less than 90 for $119 00 cheap adipex pill lowest price adipex shipped overnight from west coast weight loss testimonials with adipex phentermine directly and discreetly adipex lowest price for adipex overnight shipping cheap adipex diet pill adipex diet diet pill prescription strongest diet adipex free ship cheap adipex drug stores online weight loss drug adipex bontril phentermine adipex success stories on adipex order adipex p online cheapest rates on adipex adipex danger drug adipex adipex user adipex effects harmful side adipex cheap phentermine adipex buy cod adipex ingredients adipex story adipex tenuate adipex canada
Popular Posts
Archives
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- December 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
March 24, 2005
8 Responses to “The connotations of poor web design”
Leave a Reply
March 24th, 2005 at 3:24 pm
Not just you!
That’s a *really* bad design.
March 24th, 2005 at 5:44 pm
Yep, looks just like all the other ’search portals’ sites that get stuck to your IE from spyware infections.
Then again, the layout is clean, simple and straightfoward. We should not just a design on the basis of its similarity to designs which are associated with shady companies.
March 24th, 2005 at 5:47 pm
Err, that would be “We should not just judge a design on the basis of its similarity to designs which are associated with shady companies.”
I hate guest posting :(
March 24th, 2005 at 10:32 pm
The sad thing is, that isn’t even a bad design–just one that happens to have been co-opted by domain campers. I’m not even sure what they could change to fix it…
March 27th, 2005 at 9:10 am
I don’t see anything wrong with the design. What’s the problem with the site?
March 27th, 2005 at 8:02 pm
some nice insight posts were deleted here. why?
March 27th, 2005 at 8:05 pm
I don’t really think the design sucks. I checked out the site and its nice. Usability and features are more important to me. You don’t just judge a site by its font or color. A design should be simple and functional. Sorry…maybe because I am not shallow or I tend to think more before I post my opinions.
Its ok to post subjective comments about a website. But given the level of detail that was given, I think that the article where not really thought of. A few brain-cycles will do. I just hope people should be smart enough to help each other out and stop pulling each other down. Crab mentality really sucks. Being ethical doesn’t require a Ph.d. degree anyway. I hope my comment will help enlighten your heads dudes =)
March 27th, 2005 at 11:42 pm
*Very* non-creative. It’s 2005 guys.
Often, I quickly close tabs or windows with those site designs, sparing a “few brain-cycles” to think it could be a mistyped URL.