SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS—Two of the world’s oldest telephone companies announced plans today to merge into a telecommunications giant that will better serve consumers who own stock in either company. The news broke in an at&t press release trumpeting that the BellSouth merger “Will Speed Innovation, Competition and Convergence,” easing national concerns of slow competition. At press time, consumers were too busy converging to comment.
The news is less rosy for employees of the new company as it seeks to eliminate redundancy. BellSouth will lay off 50%—or 13,500—of its Dinnertime Telemarketers division, although most have already found new work as Perfume Blasters at Bloomingdale’s.
In an unusual twist, the announcement suggested not that the merger would ultimately bring both companies down in a spectacular fireball of finger-pointing and public humiliation, but instead that “this merger is a logical next step that creates substantial value” for consumers. AT&T Chairman Edward Whitacre promised that while customer service wait times would double, consumers would now be able to wait over Internet Protocol (WOIP).
The news comes amid a massive branding campaign by at&t to reposition itself as the nation’s provider of key services via billboards and newspaper ads that herald the company’s mission as “blogging delivered” and “photos delivered” . The campaign, which wraps up next month with “babies delivered,” seeks to revitalize the brand following a 2004 study that over 86% of adult males ages 18-26 identify AT&T as “some sort of pog?” In an effort to appear more trendy, the company lowercased its namesake to dismal results. But with SBC and now BellSouth under its belt, some analysts speculate that AT&T might be pursuing the holy grail of trendiness: a palindrome.
“They’re AT&SBC&BS&T now. Just one thing missing, and damned if I’m going to tell you what it is,” said Nigel McSnackenmeyer, a former Merrill-Lynch analyst who resigned today to found a new telecommunications company called “A”.
Shares in red-tape production companies rose $2500 in afterhours trading.



March 5th, 2006 at 5:19 pm
Many roffles and waffles to you, Blake. *claps*
March 5th, 2006 at 9:54 pm
This should grace the frontpage of theonion.com
March 6th, 2006 at 7:31 am
This person thinks the at&t “blogging delivered” sings are a bunch of bunk:
http://www.nickdavis.com/index.php?q=node/144/print
March 6th, 2006 at 12:28 pm
What about Alltel?
:^)March 7th, 2006 at 8:51 am
LOL and ditto what Chris said - you oughta be writing for the Onion!
March 15th, 2006 at 9:16 am
I love it. Bring on the palindromes!
July 2nd, 2006 at 7:30 am
Unfortunately I am an SBC-Yahoo subscriber as it’s the only way to get broadband of any type around here.
I must say that from the quality of service and the price that I’d call them the AOL of broadband ISP’s, if you have any choice in the matter, don’t go with them.
“Well, see we just need you to sign a one year contract and agree to add tons of junk you don’t need to your phone service and then here in the fine print you agree to pay $400 should you decide to cancel before your year is up.”